2 edition of Local Government Antitrust Act of 1984 found in the catalog.
Local Government Antitrust Act of 1984
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary
|Series||Report / 98th Congress, 2d session, House of Representatives -- 98-965|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||26 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||26|
Description: Set of statutes regulating economic competition by prohibiting anticompetitive agreements, monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracies to monopolize, and mergers and acquisitions that may tend to substantially injure competition. Significance: After the Sherman Antitrust Act was passed in , the Supreme Court defined the scope of antitrust law and interpreted its. mand legislation that would reduce their exposure to antitrust lia-*Associate Professor of Law, Southern Illinois University School of Law. A substantial portion of this article will appear in a forthcoming book by the same author, ANTITRUST LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT, published by Greenwood Press. The author would like to express.
The McCarran-Ferguson Act does not exempt all actions by insurance companies from antitrust liability. True False The Local Government Antitrust Act of eliminates damage actions against municipalities and their officers, agents, and employees for antitrust violations and makes injunctive relief the sole remedy in such cases. True False. Several statutes, mostly codified in Title 18 of the United States Code, provide for federal prosecution of public corruption in the United l prosecutions of public corruption under the Hobbs Act (enacted ), the mail and wire fraud statutes (enacted ), including the honest services fraud provision, the Travel Act (enacted ), and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt.
Emergency medical services is one of the essential public safety functions for which local government has responsibility. The basic purpose of any emergency medical services system is to reduce the incidence of injury and death resulting from emergency situations. The EMS system rapidly responds to emergency requests with personnel medically trained to treat and stabilize the patient at the. ] LOCAL GOVERNMENT ANTITRUST Jefferson County authorizes suits against local governments under the Robinson-Patman Act? and, implicitly, the Clayton Act" 0. as well. The case fails, however, to resolve two important issues. First, to what extent do the antitrust laws apply to state and local governments?
Rfem Seasons, the Is (Focus)
Protocol for X-ray dosimetry
Latin American common market?
Mental disorders in urban areas
An introduction to economic reporting
The stars in the bright sky
House of cards.
Tempe, Mesa, Chandler & Gilbert, Arizona Streetmap
survey of local origins and destinations of users of Washington National Airport
Water quality of the Otonabee River and Rice Lake in the years 1971-1977
Sangam age Tamil coins
Convergence 2e & Comment
H.R. (98th). An act to clarify the application of the Local Government Antitrust Act of 1984 book Act to the official conduct of local governments, and for other purposes.
In H.R. (98th). A bill to clarify application of the Federal antitrust laws to the official conduct of local governments.
Ina database of bills in the U.S. Congress. Government publication, National government publication: Document Type: Book: All Authors / Contributors: United States. OCLC Number: Notes: Caption title: An Act to Clarify the Application of the Clayton Act to the Official Conduct of Local Governments, and for Other Purposes.
"Public Law " "Oct. 24,(H.R. )"--Page. Sometimes these names say something about the substance of the law (as with the ' Winter Olympic Commemorative Coin Act'). Sometimes they are a way of recognizing or honoring the sponsor or creator of a particular law (as with the 'Taft-Hartley Act').
Shown Here: Conference report filed in House (10/10/) (Conference report filed in House, H. Rept. ) Local Government Antitrust Act of - Prohibits the recovery of damages, interest on damages, litigation costs, or attorney fees in an antitrust action from any local government or any local government employee or official acting in an official capacity.
Get this from a library. Local Government Antitrust Act of report together with additional views (to accompany H.R. ) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). [United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary.]. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Local United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may Government be cited as the "Local Government Antitrust Act of ".
Antitrust Act of SEC. For purposes of this Act— 15 u s e 1 note. (1) the term "local government" means— 15 u s e Municipal antitrust legislation: Local Government Antitrust Act of hearings before the Subcommittee on Monopolies and Commercial Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session, on H.R.
and related bills. The Sherman Antitrust Act of (26 Stat.15 U.S.C. §§ 1–7) is a United States antitrust law that regulates competition among enterprises, which was passed by Congress under the presidency of Benjamin is named for Senator John Sherman, its principal author. The Sherman Act broadly prohibits (1) anticompetitive agreements and (2) unilateral conduct that monopolizes or.
Sherman Act -- Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-patman Act -- Federal trade commission Act -- Treaty establishing the European Economic Community -- International antitrust enforcement assistance Act of -- Antitrust civil process Act -- Export trading companies Act of -- Foreign sovereign immunities Act of -- Health care quality improvement Act of -- Local government.
Local Government Antitrust Act of - Prohibits the recovery of damages, interest on damages, litigation costs, or attorney fees in an antitrust action from any local government or any local government employee or official acting in an official capacity.
Provides that such prohibition shall not apply to cases commenced before the effective. 10/10/Conference report filed in House. (Conference report filed in House, H. Rept. ) Local Government Antitrust Act of - Prohibits the recovery of damages, interest on damages, litigation costs, or attorney fees in an antitrust action from any local government or any local government employee or official acting in an official.
Today I am signing into law H.R. the Local Government Antitrust Act ofwhich clarifies the application of the Federal antitrust laws to the official conduct of local governments. This bill provides much needed and timely relief for our cities, towns, school districts, sanitary districts, and other similar local governmental bodies.
Get this from a library. The Local Government Antitrust Act of hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session, on S. Ap [United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary.]. The breakup of the Bell System was mandated on January 8, by an agreed consent decree providing that AT&T Corporation would, as had been initially proposed by AT&T, relinquish control of the Bell Operating Companies that had provided local telephone service in the United States and Canada up until that point.
This effectively took the monopoly that was the Bell System and split it into. In the United States, major federal antitrust legislations include the Sherman Act ofthe Clayton Act ofand the Federal Trade Commission Act of While these laws have not been used to break up a business since the aborted attempt on Microsoft inthey do form the basis of the federal government’s mechanism to handle.
The Local Government Antitrust Act: report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, on S. Law No.the Local Government Antitrust Act of ("Act"), in October Unlike bills introduced during the 98th Congress that would have adjusted the Court's activity-oriented exemption standard,"1 the Act tive conduct." See Halie, S.
at. In Januarythe United States Supreme Court held in Community Communications Company v. City of Boulder, Colorado (the Boulder decision) that sub-state governmental entities (cities, towns, counties, state chartered agencies and other local governments) are subject to review under the federal antitrust laws first passed by the U.S.
Congress in (the Sherman Act). Each year, the Federal Government provides over $ billion in grants to State, local and tribal governments, colleges, universities and other non-profit organizations (non-Federal entities). The Single Audit Act of (with amendment in ) and OMB Circular A ("Audits of State, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations") provide.
This Technical Bulletin looks at the Local Government Antitrust Act ofwhich was approved by Congress on October Comments The MTAS publications provided on this website are archival documents intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered as authoritative.These activities are governed by the Shipping Act ofamended most recently by the Shipping Act ofwhich reaffirmed antitrust immunity for conference rate-setting while giving carriers more flexibility on rates (for example, by allowing carriers and shippers to enter into contracts for rates outside the conference tariff) (Hershman.§ Recovery of damages, etc., for antitrust violations on claim against person based on official action directed by local government, or official or employee thereof acting in an official capacity § Immunity from antitrust laws § 37a.
Definitions § 37b. Confirmation of antitrust status of graduate medical resident matching programs.